Re: configure

[Jeff Johnston <jjohnstn at redhat dot com>]

Steve Ellcey wrote:
> > I can't comment on the Debian packages, but FWIW: I use aclocal 1.4-p6, 
> > automake 1.4-p6, and autoconf 2.13 locally.  I run the following in the 
> > top-level newlib directory:
> >
> >   aclocal -I .
> >   autoconf
> >   automake --cygnus Makefile
> >
> > This does not result in bringing in a 2.50 prereq.
> >
> > -- Jeff J.
>
>
> At the risk of causing some email thread drift, I was just asking over
> on the GCC and binutils mailing lists about moving from autoconf 2.13 to
> autoconf 2.59.  Is anyone looking at making this change for the newlib
> subdirectories?
>
> Does anyone know of any issues that would prevent moving newlib to a
> newer autoconf?

I looked at it briefly a while ago and ran into a number of problems due 
to the fact that newlib required some macros that were taken away plus 
there were a number of other backward compatibility issues.  At the time 
I didn't see any compelling reason to make the switch.

I have just started relooking at it today.  I have gotten through a 
number of issues so far.  I still have to remove the annoying warnings 
about AC_CONFIG_SUBDIRS using a literal in the machine/OS-specific 
directories.  We configure the name of the machine directory and sys 
directory once at the top-level.  This name corresponds to 
subdirectories of lower directories which we conditionally configure 
using the names specified above.  It used to be nice and simple.

-- Jeff J.

> Steve Ellcey
> sje@cup.hp.com