This is the mail archive of the
newlib@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the newlib project.
Re: ARM memcpy
- From: "Joel Sherrill <joel at OARcorp dot com>" <joel dot sherrill at OARcorp dot com>
- To: "J. Johnston" <jjohnstn at redhat dot com>
- Cc: newlib at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2002 16:43:09 -0500
- Subject: Re: ARM memcpy
- Organization: OAR Corporation
- References: <3DA1ED00.B1CF6ADA@OARcorp.com> <3DA1F84A.E67FE985@redhat.com>
- Reply-to: joel dot sherrill at OARcorp dot com
"J. Johnston" wrote:
>
> "Joel Sherrill " wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am doing a fall housecleaning and submitting all of the
> > pieces of the RTEMS newlib patch. This one adds an
> > ARM specific memcpy.
> >
> > OK to commit?
> >
> > 2002-08-22 Joel Sherrill <joel@OARcorp.com>
> >
> > * libc/machine/arm/memcpy.S: New file.
> > * libc/machine/arm/Makefile.am: Reflect addition.
> >
> > --
> > Joel Sherrill, Ph.D. Director of Research & Development
> > joel@OARcorp.com On-Line Applications Research
> > Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS Huntsville AL 35805
> > Support Available (256) 722-9985
> >
>
> Joel, there is a problem. There is an advertising clause in the license that is
> not permitted. You will have to either find out if the file has been updated or if
> there is permission to remove the clause, otherwise you will have to find another
> source for the file.
>
> If you do get an update for the license, please add a patch for COPYING.NEWLIB
> to your resubmission.
This came from NetBSD and their current source still has the
same notice. I am happy to grab one from another place but
can't find one this afternoon that is more suitable.
Unless someone has another arm/memcpy.S up their sleeves,
I will make a patch to COPYING.NEWLIB and resubmit.
> -- Jeff J.
--
Joel Sherrill, Ph.D. Director of Research & Development
joel@OARcorp.com On-Line Applications Research
Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS Huntsville AL 35805
Support Available (256) 722-9985