This is the mail archive of the
libffi-discuss@sourceware.org
mailing list for the libffi project.
Re: [gofrontend-dev] Re: [PATCH 00/13] Go closures, libffi, and the static chain
- From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
- To: libffi-discuss at sourceware dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, gofrontend-dev at googlegroups dot com
- Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 10:14:21 -0800
- Subject: Re: [gofrontend-dev] Re: [PATCH 00/13] Go closures, libffi, and the static chain
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <1412973773-3942-1-git-send-email-rth at redhat dot com> <20141211090623 dot GA30484 at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com> <20141211092144 dot GE4283 at bubble dot grove dot modra dot org> <20141211103106 dot GA9789 at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com> <20141211122519 dot GA26215 at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com> <5489F6D0 dot 8020009 at redhat dot com> <20141212120630 dot GA32026 at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com>
On 12/12/2014 04:06 AM, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> I'm not sure I've posted the missing patch anywhere yet, so it's
> attached to this message. At the moment it enables
> FFI_TYPE_COMPLEX only for s390[x], but eventually this should be
> used unconditionally.
Thanks for that. I'd been meaning to get around to that. I'll change the test
to use FFI_TARGET_HAS_COMPLEX_TYPE and apply it to my branch.
> (This still leaves the dynamic linking issue if we do not use
> libffi for reflection calls with x86* and s390[x]. Is the plan to
> remove the platform specific abi code for the few platforms that
> have it? I see no way to make them work with the static chain
> patch anyway.)
Well, the x86 paths were updated to work with the static chain, but indeed that
required assembly rather than cheating and using C as you did.
But removing all of that was always my goal. Indeed, my branch now has a patch
to remove all of the target-specific code. Tested only on x86_64 so far, but I
plan to test i686 today.
r~
- References:
- [PATCH 00/13] Go closures, libffi, and the static chain
- Re: [PATCH 00/13] Go closures, libffi, and the static chain
- Re: [PATCH 00/13] Go closures, libffi, and the static chain
- Re: [gofrontend-dev] Re: [PATCH 00/13] Go closures, libffi, and the static chain
- Re: [gofrontend-dev] Re: [PATCH 00/13] Go closures, libffi, and the static chain
- Re: [gofrontend-dev] Re: [PATCH 00/13] Go closures, libffi, and the static chain
- Re: [gofrontend-dev] Re: [PATCH 00/13] Go closures, libffi, and the static chain