This is the mail archive of the
libc-ports@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the libc-ports project.
Re: Glibc-ports status? Creating glibc-ports tarball for 2.13?
- From: Matt Turner <mattst88 at gmail dot com>
- To: "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos at codesourcery dot com>
- Cc: libc-ports at sourceware dot org, "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>, "Ryan S. Arnold" <rsa at us dot ibm dot com>, Andreas Schwab <schwab at linux-m68k dot org>, Richard Henderson <rth at twiddle dot net>, Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot de>, Philip Blundell <philb at gnu dot org>
- Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 14:51:42 +0000
- Subject: Re: Glibc-ports status? Creating glibc-ports tarball for 2.13?
- References: <4D59305D.7040605@codesourcery.com>
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 1:38 PM, Carlos O'Donell
<carlos@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> What is the status of all the machines in glibc-ports with respect to
> the glibc-2.13 tag in libc-ports?
>
> Alpha - Richard?
Needs a couple header-updating patches, but otherwise only trivial
changes. I'd be nice to get these into glibc-2.13, but it won't really
hurt anything if they don't get in.
It sure would be nice if we could avoid patching nearly identical
headers in nearly identical ways for each architecture...
Matt