This is the mail archive of the libc-help@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Help: looking for equivalent syscall to shutdown() but for unix pipes

From: Alexandre Bique <bique dot alexandre at gmail dot com>
To: Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval dot zanella at linaro dot org>
Cc: libc-help at sourceware dot org
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2019 15:44:40 +0100
Subject: Re: Help: looking for equivalent syscall to shutdown() but for unix pipes
References: <CAP737oKftbrxDDRX7RM_PBVTcx54d+j=Vz5LJysq=3D0CNeRvw@mail.gmail.com> <87r2dbu0t8.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> <CAP737o+A0OoRM1D1QR6=cg1i+wu37q2NU9bxOskEtdSfbqD=3w@mail.gmail.com> <871s5aqnqn.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> <19b0c190-6ea1-8c56-faaf-a044ca2aee28@linaro.org>

On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 1:36 PM Adhemerval Zanella
<adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org> wrote:
> Maybe use socketpair if unidirectional is not required?

We don't need a bi-directional communication, we wanted to stick with
pipe and solve the issue.

-- 
Alexandre Bique

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Help: looking for equivalent syscall to shutdown() but for unix pipes
  - From: Alexandre Bique

References:
- Help: looking for equivalent syscall to shutdown() but for unix pipes
  - From: Alexandre Bique
- Re: Help: looking for equivalent syscall to shutdown() but for unix pipes
  - From: Florian Weimer
- Re: Help: looking for equivalent syscall to shutdown() but for unix pipes
  - From: Alexandre Bique
- Re: Help: looking for equivalent syscall to shutdown() but for unix pipes
  - From: Florian Weimer
- Re: Help: looking for equivalent syscall to shutdown() but for unix pipes
  - From: Adhemerval Zanella

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]