Re: Error building glibc-2.10.1

["Justin P. Mattock" <justinmattock at gmail dot com>]

JohnT wrote:
> Justin P. Mattock wrote:
> > JohnT wrote:
> > >  Since the current or previous release of Centos (Redhat Enterprise) 
> > > used glibc-2.5x, I thought it would be considered recent, but here's 
> > > a glibc-2.10.1 problem I encountered. The configuration settings were:
> > >
> > > --prefix=/usr  CFLAGS=" -O2 -march=i686"
> > >
> > > /home2/on07/bldlib210/libc_pic.os: In function `fallocate':
> > > (.text+0xaedb4): undefined reference to `__call_fallocate'
> > > /home2/on07/bldlib210/libc_pic.os: In function `__fallocate64_l64':
> > > (.text+0xaedc5): undefined reference to `__call_fallocate'
> > > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
> > > make[1]: *** [/home2/on07/bldlib210/libc.so] Error 1
> > > make[1]: Leaving directory `/home2/on07/glibc-2.10.1'
> > > make: *** [all] Error 2
> > >
> > > Again, help in resolving this so I can get a successful build would 
> > > be appreciated. The assembler syntax change was a very good tip, not 
> > > obvious from binutils or gas changelog.
> > >
> > > John Tellefson
> > not sure whats happening, but by
> > just glancing I see that:
> > libc_pic.os was/is being  built
> > with no idea about  __call_fallocate'
> >
> > maybe a header file, or a library
> > that's been built with the wrong dependencies.
> >
> > Justin P. Mattock
> If so, then the configure script missed some things, maybe version 
> numbers of system source libs needed to build the libc-pic.os library 
> correctly.
>
> John
>
> --
> http://www.mozilla.org   Firefox browser, Thunderbird email, Seamonkey all-in-one, Sunbird calendar and more. Free open-source software for Windows, Linux, Mac OS and other systems
>    
could be, but if you compiled another program/lib the wrong
way then glibc's configure script wouldn't know the
difference.

Justin P. Mattock