This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.
Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com> writes: > Those warnings have been appearing for a while now (I also see them with > the RH variant of gcc-3.2), but I was too lazy to look into avoiding them > until you spurred me. I was able to get rid of those warnings just by > reordering the decls in those files. The weak decls don't need to appear > before any other decl of the symbol, only before any reference in a > function or another initializer. Thanks a lot for fixing those! > > Now the only spurious warnings in my build are "declared static but never > defined" for the things defined in asm and referenced via C decls. I don't > know of any way to get rid of those. We had them for ages and I don't know whether it's possible to fix those properly at all :-( Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger SuSE Labs aj@suse.de private aj@arthur.inka.de http://www.suse.de/~aj
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |