This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sourceware.cygnus.com mailing list for the glibc project.
Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Hi Greg, you've changed syscalls.list to mention explictly the type of arguments instead the number arguments. I've got some question but first like to summarize the situation to clarify it. Your notation is something like "i:spi" where the argument before the colon is the return type (seems to be required) and the rest are the arguments. The notation is "i" for an integer argument, "s" for a string argument (pointer to char), "p" for a general pointer (void pointer). My questions now are: - "i" can be an integer of any size - the important information is here that it is *not* a pointer. Is this right? - Why are you differentiating between "s" and "p"? Where are you treating strings different than other pointers? - Does it make sense to convert the remaining syscalls.list files? Not everything is changed so far. Is it a problem if something hasn't been converted for the bounded pointer case? Could you please also document the notation for the arguments somewhere? Thanks, Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger SuSE Labs aj@suse.de private aj@arthur.inka.de
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |