This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: switching ARC to 64-bit time_t (Re: [RFC v6 07/23] RISC-V: Use 64-bit time_t and off_t for RV32 and RV64)
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd at arndb dot de>
- To: Lukasz Majewski <lukma at denx dot de>
- Cc: Vineet Gupta <Vineet dot Gupta1 at synopsys dot com>, Alistair Francis <alistair23 at gmail dot com>, Joseph Myers <joseph at codesourcery dot com>, Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat dot com>, GNU C Library <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>, Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt at google dot com>, Zong Li <zongbox at gmail dot com>, Alistair Francis <alistair dot francis at wdc dot com>, Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval dot zanella at linaro dot org>, "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro at wdc dot com>, arcml <linux-snps-arc at lists dot infradead dot org>, debian-arm at lists dot debian dot org, Helmut Grohne <helmutg at debian dot org>
- Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2020 10:03:29 +0100
- Subject: Re: switching ARC to 64-bit time_t (Re: [RFC v6 07/23] RISC-V: Use 64-bit time_t and off_t for RV32 and RV64)
- References: <cover.1578824547.git.alistair.francis@wdc.com> <4e95f95966d8d7c6a8339160dc62d81c1f6a1bfb.1578824547.git.alistair.francis@wdc.com> <00574bfb-981a-3a1c-cbdf-b2fee4eddc32@gmail.com> <CAKmqyKMyf2psPp+-EHoidvbPbSXv0=dP26GjVQnT5BUriLc1gA@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.21.2002120123230.3988@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <CAKmqyKOgFRfMOws_-48GqMnuS3ygmN9A4DzLg6UtEjRXVoM82A@mail.gmail.com> <8a9784b3-fc52-adc3-4595-33142b059388@synopsys.com> <20200220001136.2f14236e@jawa> <CAK8P3a1b73K+RjfHONWLy_dFUucXxwd+0jTnHmkf6YqwRjit4w@mail.gmail.com> <20200220103716.2f526933@jawa> <CAK8P3a2n6fRm4C5Ywyk5ys92jSOAc5SwvBVZyFOY9=4rB2pyjw@mail.gmail.com> <20200224100051.2511d797@jawa>
On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 10:01 AM Lukasz Majewski <lukma@denx.de> wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 10:37 AM Lukasz Majewski <lukma@denx.de>
> > wrote:
> > which seems a bug in the test suite. The other two get a segfault
> > that I have not debugged, but I guess this is likely a problem in your
> > patches. Have you seen the same thing?
>
> I only do run the full (including full test suite) glibc-many-build
> (and my Y2038 tests) on the patches which I post to glibc-alpha.
>
> The Y2038 changes I do test manually if they work as expected - but I
> do not run yet the (full) test suites on it, as first _all_ glibc
> functions needs to be converted before _TIME_BITS=64 is added.
>
> The issue is probably with the redirection code. I will look on them
> soon.
Ok, thanks for taking a look, I won't debug this further then,
unless you need help reproducing the issues.
Arnd