This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
ARCv2 Public PRM (was Re: [PATCH v2 00/15] glibc port to ARC processors)
- From: Vineet Gupta <Vineet dot Gupta1 at synopsys dot com>
- To: Joseph Myers <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
- Cc: "linux-snps-arc at lists dot infradead dot org" <linux-snps-arc at lists dot infradead dot org>, "libc-alpha at sourceware dot org" <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2020 19:34:54 +0000
- Subject: ARCv2 Public PRM (was Re: [PATCH v2 00/15] glibc port to ARC processors)
- Arc-authentication-results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=synopsys.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=synopsys.com; dkim=pass header.d=synopsys.com; arc=none
- Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=JzlijdDaNtW8uIC1kf6NXa8coFBN5mPK8DEhVi6hL+g=; b=oSNqKalbEB7QNd682NdDA5jRLnpfr7GZ6MsxCOOeOIjCvijjS4UlMxmgYCSrrUBIzzxUOuq6x/O4sqSpVXFij856nZIqh7RD32lMW/RJxtiOpiW7wUv49VQU/BwtOTjSjVRuR/oPUSq54Z8t465v967ozlkNGBGTtHSFXmfV89Bn8E0hBN30n7meHIoAWqu5NmxHzpsJtJ4OzvAE2850HbriITPiSiLdXXUxWMJtS7CME0CdxmjslbxNlciT39Gay5du9pB4VdSR/galkuDVKevW5Yepm31J9niLTy+eaLcPFso7J5p49qTOqepLfxMep9Z1hShq8tVk6p9NveEL/g==
- Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=PDW6Q1AOfOcrF4Ty4gOC+szhVQlTTWqDjWg4zwrHioxk1igG3R6lBvQHwjybvEzEdJXm38glW9egAMzJOLRQiVxQI2o+aB4ps5+KEcvU+IcluLBiGIy2Zc9ahHKfnkO5COGw3Yzy9ERRithgN/5FzF76p6JV11yblt2aIlm02P5VYM+qAWmzKI5Lmq34joBKMUOkdTgnzBvLFhmeeN7OKUiIgbljZ43A6bFVnNfODr26PBtpwrMpLB+7dMkbbcP6macknBGznwHY0z4FDP9iAkz45C+1gAf3/1ZxY2LPwfpiF25GaxQ1S4X85+SHaUiyoE3B14n7qyjEOUSgU8gyxw==
- References: <1548811555-24373-1-git-send-email-vgupta@synopsys.com> <alpine.DEB.2.21.1901300220520.24454@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <980d8411-e4b9-24c0-3340-c112d6d6c349@synopsys.com>
Hi Joseph,
On 1/30/19 10:15 AM, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> On 1/29/19 6:29 PM, Joseph Myers wrote:
>> In the absence of clear consensus regarding consideration of new ports to
>> undocumented architectures (which would need to result in consensus on
>> suitable rules on the subject to go in
>> <https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/NewPorts>), and in the absence of
>> suitable public architecture and ABI documentation, I don't intend to
>> attempt review of this or subsequent versions of the port submission.
>
> That would be really unfortunate. Your prior reviews of RFC and v1 have been
> immensely helpful, it would be a shame to not continue to get this privilege goinf
> fwd.
>
> Having said that, wheels were already set in motion after your initial request in
> December. The ARCv2 ABI spec was opened up quickly (and mea culpa for not
> referencing it v2 submission). It is now publicly accessibly at [1]
>
> The public version of PRM is being worked on, but it will take time to come to
> fruition. I hope you appreciate these things take time, considering where we came
> from - and it seems you found a workaround anyways ;-)
The public PRM is now available and I would like you to try and access it so that
any bureaucracy is out of the way before I re-post ARC port for 2.32 !
Do note you still need to register to download but that is no different than say ARM.
The landing page is
https://www.synopsys.com/dw/ipdir.php?ds=arc-hs44-hs46-hs48
And there in the link to actual doc is
https://www.synopsys.com/dw/doc.php/ds/cc/programmers-reference-manual-ARC-HS.pdf
Let me know how it goes.
Thx,
-Vineet