This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH 2/2] dlopen: Do not block signals



On 05/12/2019 12:20, Florian Weimer wrote:
> Blocking signals causes issues with certain anti-malware solutions
> which rely on an unblocked SIGSYS signal for system calls they
> intercept.
> 
> This reverts commit a2e8aa0d9ea648068d8be52dd7b15f1b6a008e23
> ("Block signals during the initial part of dlopen") and adds
> comments related to async signal safety to active_nodelete and
> its caller.
> 
> Note that this does not make lazy binding async-signal-safe with regards
> to dlopen.  It merely avoids introducing new async-signal-safety hazards
> as part of the NODELETE changes.

LGTM, thanks.

Reviewed-by: Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>

> ---
>  elf/dl-open.c | 37 +++++++++++--------------------------
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/elf/dl-open.c b/elf/dl-open.c
> index c23341be58..5a1c5b5326 100644
> --- a/elf/dl-open.c
> +++ b/elf/dl-open.c
> @@ -34,7 +34,6 @@
>  #include <atomic.h>
>  #include <libc-internal.h>
>  #include <array_length.h>
> -#include <internal-signals.h>
>  
>  #include <dl-dst.h>
>  #include <dl-prop.h>
> @@ -53,10 +52,6 @@ struct dl_open_args
>    /* Namespace ID.  */
>    Lmid_t nsid;
>  
> -  /* Original signal mask.  Used for unblocking signal handlers before
> -     running ELF constructors.  */
> -  sigset_t original_signal_mask;
> -
>    /* Original value of _ns_global_scope_pending_adds.  Set by
>       dl_open_worker.  Only valid if nsid is a real namespace
>       (non-negative).  */

Ok.

> @@ -446,6 +441,9 @@ activate_nodelete (struct link_map *new)
>  	  _dl_debug_printf ("activating NODELETE for %s [%lu]\n",
>  			    l->l_name, l->l_ns);
>  
> +	/* The flag can already be true at this point, e.g. a signal
> +	   handler may have triggered lazy binding and set NODELETE
> +	   status immediately.  */
>  	l->l_nodelete_active = true;
>  
>  	/* This is just a debugging aid, to indicate that

Ok.

> @@ -520,16 +518,12 @@ dl_open_worker (void *a)
>    if (new == NULL)
>      {
>        assert (mode & RTLD_NOLOAD);
> -      __libc_signal_restore_set (&args->original_signal_mask);
>        return;
>      }
>  
>    if (__glibc_unlikely (mode & __RTLD_SPROF))
> -    {
> -      /* This happens only if we load a DSO for 'sprof'.  */
> -      __libc_signal_restore_set (&args->original_signal_mask);
> -      return;
> -    }
> +    /* This happens only if we load a DSO for 'sprof'.  */
> +    return;
>  
>    /* This object is directly loaded.  */
>    ++new->l_direct_opencount;

Ok.

> @@ -565,7 +559,6 @@ dl_open_worker (void *a)
>  
>        assert (_dl_debug_initialize (0, args->nsid)->r_state == RT_CONSISTENT);
>  
> -      __libc_signal_restore_set (&args->original_signal_mask);
>        return;
>      }
>  

Ok.

> @@ -712,6 +705,12 @@ dl_open_worker (void *a)
>       All memory allocations for new objects must have happened
>       before.  */
>  
> +  /* Finalize the NODELETE status first.  This comes before
> +     update_scopes, so that lazy binding will not see pending NODELETE
> +     state for newly loaded objects.  There is a compiler barrier in
> +     update_scopes which ensures that the changes from
> +     activate_nodelete are visible before new objects show up in the
> +     local scope.  */
>    activate_nodelete (new);
>  
>    /* Second stage after resize_scopes: Actually perform the scope

Ok.

> @@ -745,10 +744,6 @@ dl_open_worker (void *a)
>    if (mode & RTLD_GLOBAL)
>      add_to_global_resize (new);
>  
> -  /* Unblock signals.  Data structures are now consistent, and
> -     application code may run.  */
> -  __libc_signal_restore_set (&args->original_signal_mask);
> -
>    /* Run the initializer functions of new objects.  Temporarily
>       disable the exception handler, so that lazy binding failures are
>       fatal.  */

Ok.

> @@ -838,10 +833,6 @@ no more namespaces available for dlmopen()"));
>    args.argv = argv;
>    args.env = env;
>  
> -  /* Recursive lazy binding during manipulation of the dynamic loader
> -     structures may result in incorrect behavior.  */
> -  __libc_signal_block_all (&args.original_signal_mask);
> -
>    struct dl_exception exception;
>    int errcode = _dl_catch_exception (&exception, dl_open_worker, &args);
>  

Ok.

> @@ -882,16 +873,10 @@ no more namespaces available for dlmopen()"));
>  
>  	  _dl_close_worker (args.map, true);
>  
> -	  /* Restore the signal mask.  In the success case, this
> -	     happens inside dl_open_worker.  */
> -	  __libc_signal_restore_set (&args.original_signal_mask);
> -
>  	  /* All l_nodelete_pending objects should have been deleted
>  	     at this point, which is why it is not necessary to reset
>  	     the flag here.  */
>  	}
> -      else
> -	__libc_signal_restore_set (&args.original_signal_mask);
>  
>        assert (_dl_debug_initialize (0, args.nsid)->r_state == RT_CONSISTENT);
>  
> 

Ok.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]