This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH v3 1/7] Fix __libc_signal_block_all on sparc64


On 12/12/2019 13:30, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> On Dez 12 2019, Adhemerval Zanella wrote:
> 
>> Well I am seeing such behaviour with gcc 9.2.1 on x86_64 at least:
> 
> That's a missed optimisation bug in gcc then.  There should not be a
> difference between a const compound literal and a static const object,
> if only constant expressions are used for initialisation.
> 
> Andreas.
> 

Yes, but it does not answer my previous question: is this a block for
the patch?
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]