This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [PATCH] tst-clone3: Use __NR_futex_time64 if we don't have __NR_futex
- From: Alistair Francis <alistair23 at gmail dot com>
- To: Alistair Francis <alistair dot francis at wdc dot com>
- Cc: GNU C Library <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2019 10:54:24 -0800
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] tst-clone3: Use __NR_futex_time64 if we don't have __NR_futex
- References: <20191112173654.19842-1-alistair.francis@wdc.com> <CAKmqyKO2hqKtA1+BoBKk6TsPpoXTy7y-6YSd67DXrwW_2+Srcw@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 10:56 AM Alistair Francis <alistair23@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 9:42 AM Alistair Francis
> <alistair.francis@wdc.com> wrote:
> >
> > We can't include sysdep.h in the test case (it introduces lots of
> > strange failures) so __NR_futex isn't redifined to __NR_futex_time64 by
> > 64-bit time_t 32-bit archs (y2038 safe).
> >
> > To allow the test to pass let's just do the __NR_futex_time64 syscall if
> > we don't have __NR_futex defined.
>
> Ping!
Ping^2
>
> Alistair
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
> > ---
> > sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/tst-clone3.c | 4 ++++
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/tst-clone3.c b/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/tst-clone3.c
> > index 76f8b08a692..c211445e77f 100644
> > --- a/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/tst-clone3.c
> > +++ b/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/tst-clone3.c
> > @@ -56,7 +56,11 @@ f (void *a)
> > static inline int
> > futex_wait (int *futexp, int val)
> > {
> > +#ifdef __NR_futex
> > return syscall (__NR_futex, futexp, FUTEX_WAIT, val);
> > +#else
> > + return syscall (__NR_futex_time64, futexp, FUTEX_WAIT, val);
> > +#endif
> > }
> >
> > static int
> > --
> > 2.23.0
> >