This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [X-POST] patchwork.sourceware.org refresh
- From: Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh at gotplt dot org>
- To: Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin at linuxfoundation dot org>
- Cc: Christian Brauner <christian dot brauner at ubuntu dot com>, Florian Weimer <fw at deneb dot enyo dot de>, GLIBC Devel <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>, gdb-patches at sourceware dot org, help-guix at gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2019 22:29:49 +0530
- Subject: Re: [X-POST] patchwork.sourceware.org refresh
- References: <78c774ef-9f9c-3339-aeb8-84636ee94360@gotplt.org> <d6b8afad-7c98-c23f-aca9-e81072ecdfe4@gotplt.org> <87y2vnxbk2.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> <20191208122116.ae5wl4eytedt54vg@wittgenstein> <821c81bd-3c9a-0d33-ffbe-924de796dc7e@gotplt.org> <20191209165222.oanyqa7s73gzz6yd@chatter.i7.local>
On 09/12/19 10:22 pm, Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote:
> I'm not sure it makes that much sense to put glibc on
> patchwork.kernel.org. I know we have some non-kernel projects there, but
> they are pretty tiny and were approved largely because they wouldn't
> make much of an impact on kernel.org infra.
>
> The same wouldn't be true for glibc, especially if we're talking bot and
> CI integration. It really needs to stay on its own dedicated
> infrastructure where it can be properly scoped and resourced.
>
> Sorry that I don't have a better answer.
>
I understand, thanks anyway.
Siddhesh