This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] For Adding clang check


* kamlesh kumar:

> It fixes this.
> https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44169

What's the rationale for the condition?  What's special about Clang
3.5?

My understanding is that a compiler needs support for asm aliases
*and* the C++ library headers need to be compatible.  Is there a way
to determine if libc++ is compatible?  For libstdc++ with GCC, the
compiler version check covers libstdc++ implicity, but that does not
apply to Clang, or libc++ with either compiler.

> On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 12:22 AM Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de> wrote:
>>
>> * Kamlesh Kumar:
>>
>> > ChangeLog :
>> >
>> > 2019-11-28  Kamlesh Kumar  <kamleshbhalui@gmail.com>
>> >
>> >        * string/string.h (__glibc_clang_prereq): Used.
>> > ---
>> >  string/string.h | 2 +-
>> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/string/string.h b/string/string.h
>> > index 73c22a535a..06a8977165 100644
>> > --- a/string/string.h
>> > +++ b/string/string.h
>> > @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ __BEGIN_DECLS
>> >  #include <stddef.h>
>> >
>> >  /* Tell the caller that we provide correct C++ prototypes.  */
>> > -#if defined __cplusplus && __GNUC_PREREQ (4, 4)
>> > +#if defined __cplusplus && (__GNUC_PREREQ (4, 4) || __glibc_clang_prereq(3,5))
>> >  # define __CORRECT_ISO_CPP_STRING_H_PROTO
>> >  #endif
>>
>> Sorry, what's the purpose of this change?  Thanks.
>>
>> If it fixes a user-visible problem, it should reference a bug in
>> Bugzilla.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]