This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: FYI: Status of gdb usage of gerrit

From: Florian Weimer <fw at deneb dot enyo dot de>
To: Joseph Myers <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: Carlos O'Donell <carlos at redhat dot com>, libc-alpha <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2019 09:53:20 +0100
Subject: Re: FYI: Status of gdb usage of gerrit
References: <7bb58c00-d2f3-a299-0927-00f1acd3afda@redhat.com> <87v9ra965r.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> <alpine.DEB.2.21.1911251814450.24062@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>

* Joseph Myers:

> On Sat, 23 Nov 2019, Florian Weimer wrote:
>
>> * Carlos O'Donell:
>> 
>> > I'm happy to hear any feedback those of you have about
>> > working with gerrit.
>> 
>> I would also like to hear from those who have not used it.  Your
>> opinion counts as well.
>
> We seem to have got notifications into a reasonably good state, though I'm 
> not sure if the issue was fixed where marking a patch ready for review 
> failed to send out a notification including diffs.  I think there are 
> still issues with the handling of email replies.

Would you be okay with pushing through Gerrit?  It seems that without
custom development, we would have to disable direct pushes to
sourceware, for branches managed by Gerrit.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: FYI: Status of gdb usage of gerrit
  - From: Joseph Myers

References:
- FYI: Status of gdb usage of gerrit
  - From: Carlos O'Donell
- Re: FYI: Status of gdb usage of gerrit
  - From: Florian Weimer
- Re: FYI: Status of gdb usage of gerrit
  - From: Joseph Myers

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]