This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [PATCH 00/12] Y2038 preparation: use clock_[gs]ettime to implement the other time-getting and -setting functions
- From: Joseph Myers <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
- To: Zack Weinberg <zackw at panix dot com>
- Cc: <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>, Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat dot com>, Lukasz Majewski <lukma at denx dot de>, Alistair Francis <alistair23 at gmail dot com>, Stepan Golosunov <stepan at golosunov dot pp dot ru>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd at arndb dot de>
- Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2019 15:10:31 +0000
- Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/12] Y2038 preparation: use clock_[gs]ettime to implement the other time-getting and -setting functions
- Ironport-sdr: 2hjVA1qhDi7aFoBul29FqkAbSEBCvdqPOICJX+6eMTrkbx33r94vGo6eSUq6cXHUziryRdYSlp oF9/pmBb/ISP2d/iXFmLgHV65HdtrdQ8KSzRXugkzRkZGE7/J7sBCRTnKWS0B/2sd9vkTQa1yR A+ESucvHcqldBZMxgs05szk4er07Z9x3m02CVg+c6EOdwu7OrU0IYAYahLZasd+DACvzBiCR5g SwS8bTw4K31m2LBbDpAXG3YrRQljzpcLtHEfLPd57hvzJTAMqFSVOerK3FHz2KyqeluGhTvSiC XIk=
- Ironport-sdr: Lqv/ZEixgW9BDjXv3PHX0KaUPUATHqSZr9dWNwb8TkiyupD6SqKmR0uz0fEDCGa57/s30wkzH6 ZRHZdcjMll0uwLU2nOpYLSZhKbKun8lTjB+cuQn6tol449CvTe8NgjPGdHnWGC4aVTBpsSpii9 0FqpEZVveH5oiFsjMC2gGt3PnY4ZzSGUboamEOHfvUiyRF6PZymhF7SAU99PMi5Zm0HqAPajLw g8yzY2JFN78kNV0VeB4/1VC9jY59dq5AQKUCrge8FMHWj+1cVVhkRsba6/LofQzepr7ClpwSm7 1vI=
- References: <20190820132152.24100-1-zackw@panix.com>
On Tue, 20 Aug 2019, Zack Weinberg wrote:
> Finally, there is a case for demoting ftime and stime to compatibility
> symbols and removing their public prototypes (for ftime, we would stop
> installing <sys/timeb.h> altogether).
Yes, I think that would make sense. If we do that, we don't then need to
add any _TIME_BITS=64 support for those functions.
--
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com