Re: glibc 2.30 - 6 days until ABI freeze.

[Carlos O'Donell <carlos at redhat dot com>]

On 7/10/19 4:22 PM, Adhemerval Zanella wrote:
> On 09/07/2019 15:04, Mike Crowe wrote:
> > On Friday 05 July 2019 at 16:38:37 +0100, Mike Crowe wrote:
> > > On Thursday 04 July 2019 at 16:41:27 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > > > * Adhemerval Zanella:
> > > >
> > > > > My take initial take was to add _np, but after a chat with Joseph's on
> > > > > IRC I think we should add them as expected names.  Florian has raised
> > > > > some concerns.
> > > >
> > > > Please feel free to disregard what I said if Joseph has a different
> > > > opinion.
> > >
> > > Adhemerval, does that mean we have consensus to use the unadorned names or
> > > do we need more people to comment?
> >
> > In addition, if the consensus is that the functions should be added with
> > the _np suffixes then would it be better to do that in a single new patch
> > or to modify each of the existing (but already reviewed) patches? I had a
> > go at modifying the individual patches to be prepared and the abilist
> > files cause a lot of conflicts when a function is renamed. :(
>
> I think unadorned should be simpler and should generated less trouble.

I am OK with the unadorned names.
 
> Carlos, do I have an 'ok' to push it on master?
 
Yes, please push to master. I'd like to see this land.

I'm going to hard-freeze next week.

Sorry for my delayed responses.

--
Cheers,
Carlos.