This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [PATCH v5 00/11] nds32 glibc port, v5
- From: Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat dot com>
- To: Vincent Chen <vincentc at andestech dot com>
- Cc: <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>, <deanbo422 at gmail dot com>, <cnoize at andestech dot com>
- Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2019 13:25:53 +0200
- Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/11] nds32 glibc port, v5
- References: <1561012838-11352-1-git-send-email-vincentc@andestech.com>
* Vincent Chen:
> 2. misc/tst-syscall-list
> The reason for the failure is that udftrap is missing from syscall-names.list.
> This syscall only exists in Linux 5.0 and 5.1 and will be renamed to
> fp_udfiex_ctrl in Linux 5.2. Should I send a patch which adds udftrap
> into syscall-names.list, and resend a patch for renaming after the default
> kernel version in build-many-glibcs.py is changed to 5.2? or I only send one
> patch which adds fp_udfiex_ctrl to syscall-names.list and note this failed case
> as a known issue?
We can mention any name we want in syscall-names.list. Users will only
see SYS_ names that match their kernel headers and their __NR_ names.
So we can add fp_udfiex_ctrl to the list at any time. I can review a
patch to that affect if you send it.
Thanks,
Florian