This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Remove ioperm etc. support for army

From: Phil Blundell <pb at pbcl dot net>
To: Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat dot com>
Cc: libc-alpha at sourceware dot org
Date: Wed, 29 May 2019 23:15:12 +0200
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove ioperm etc. support for army
References: <87o93lo3y9.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> <20190529135135.rt3c5fhhser7fik6@hetzner.pbcl.net> <875zptqrwx.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> <20190529141820.5nny64ugrvqyzqgd@hetzner.pbcl.net> <87r28hpb0l.fsf_-_@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> <20190529205602.rag6ctjr4cidlvzq@pbcl.net> <87muj5nf07.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com>

On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 11:10:32PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> The SHLIB_COMPAT check returns false for static builds, so nothing ends
> up in libc.a after this change.
> 
> The weak/strong alias difference is not supposed to matter for dynamic
> linking.

Right, makes sense.  In that case, I think this patch is OK.

Thanks

Phil

References:
- _ioperm support for Arm
  - From: Florian Weimer
- Re: _ioperm support for Arm
  - From: Phil Blundell
- Re: _ioperm support for Arm
  - From: Florian Weimer
- Re: _ioperm support for Arm
  - From: Phil Blundell
- [PATCH] Remove ioperm etc. support for arm (was: Re: _ioperm support for Arm)
  - From: Florian Weimer
- Re: [PATCH] Remove ioperm etc. support for arm (was: Re: _ioperm support for Arm)
  - From: Phil Blundell
- Re: [PATCH] Remove ioperm etc. support for arm
  - From: Florian Weimer

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]