This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: Fwd: What can a signal handler do with SIGSTKSZ?
* Szabolcs Nagy:
> i think proposing sysconf(_SC_{MIN}SIGSTKSZ) for posix is the
> right solution with the kernel providing an upper bound of the
> stack frame in AT_MINSIGSTKSZ (as it already does on aarch64).
It's still a bit nasty for process migration, but at least it should for
VM migration. I think that would be a reasonable compromise.
Of course, we'd still need a way to determine how much we should add on
top of AT_MINSIGSTKSZ for the application developer's benefit. 8-)
Thanks,
Florian