This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On 31/12/18 11:16 PM, Joseph Myers wrote:
Compat symbol semantics should be tested in the testsuite (with appropriate TEST_COMPAT conditionals and use of compat_symbol_reference). (There are exceptional cases where the new symbol's semantics are a refinement of the old and so the two symbol versions alias each other and no separate test of the old version is useful, but a new version is added to stop new binaries working with old libc - e.g. when some fenv.h functions changed from void to int return type following C99TC1 - but the normal case is that the compat symbols should be tested to ensure they keep working as expected.)
That's a good point, and something to keep in mind when we revive this discussion for 2.30. For 2.29, do you agree that we should revert to old behaviour?
Siddhesh
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |