This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: glibc 2.29: Reminder, only ~3 weeks to freeze!


On Tue, 18 Dec 2018, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:

> > Is there going to be a new kernel version of struct timeval at all (as 
> > opposed to the new versions of timeval-using kernel/userspace interfaces 
> > using the 64-bit version of struct timespec)?
> 
> Not sure about the kernel indeed.
> 
> But what about existing user code which calls public glibc interfaces
> which deal with struct timeval? So far there is the assumption that

Those get new 64-bit versions as usual.  The question is whether the 
struct timeval for them is purely a userspace choice (because struct 
rusage etc. kernel interfaces get new versions using timespec not timeval) 
or whether it's something to keep in sync with the kernel.

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]