This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [patch] Fix BZ#20544 (assert function passed to atexit/on_exit/__cxa_atexit != NULL)
* Adhemerval Zanella:
>> Yes, but all glibc targets currently behave the same. I don't expect
>> this to change because the a lot of things are hard-coded (see the
>> JRuby/JVM discussion on reporting signal termination).
> Do you have a link for the discussion?
I think this it:
In particular this:
Shutdown.exit(sig.getNumber() + 0200);
>> We should probably add macros to go into the other direction to
>> <sys/wait.h>, given that the layout is unlikely to change, ever.
> Is is something usually required and/or reimplemented elsewhere?
I think it would be useful for writing tests at the very least.