This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: Propose requiring Python 3.4 or later for building glibc.
- From: Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh at gotplt dot org>
- To: Carlos O'Donell <carlos at redhat dot com>, GNU C Library <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>, "Dmitry V. Levin" <ldv at altlinux dot org>, Allan McRae <allan at archlinux dot org>, Aurelien Jarno <aurelien at aurel32 dot net>, debian-glibc at lists dot debian dot org, Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat dot com>, "Andreas K. Huettel" <dilfridge at gentoo dot org>, Sergei Trofimovich <slyfox at gentoo dot org>, Khem Raj <raj dot khem at gmail dot com>, Andreas Schwab <schwab at suse dot de>, Adam Conrad <adconrad at ubuntu dot com>, Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho <tuliom at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com>, "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
- Cc: Jeff Law <law at redhat dot com>
- Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2018 19:32:58 +0530
- Subject: Re: Propose requiring Python 3.4 or later for building glibc.
- References: <258837a9-50bf-d2b3-950a-c28e5b411e8f@redhat.com>
On 19/10/18 7:17 PM, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
Siddhesh,
Any input from Linaro for toolchains being built?
My understanding is that Linaro toolchain builds should not be affected
by this bump but Adhemerval is the libraries guy in the Linaro Toolchain
Working Group, so I'll defer to him for the final word on this.
Siddhesh