This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: Use single bits/sem.h for all architectures
On 15/10/2018 12:18, Joseph Myers wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Oct 2018, Adhemerval Zanella wrote:
>> Since we currently we pass the user-defined semid_ds directly to kernel on
>> semctl, I think it is worth to add generic Linux UAPI expects news ports to
>> follow kernel semid64_ds layout:
> How about "This must match the layout used for struct semid64_ds in
> <asm/sembuf.h>, as glibc does not do layout conversions for this
> structure." (which accurately reflects the requirements, without
> duplicating information about what those requirements are).
>> I think also we should comment that if ABI uses a different type than
>> unsigned long for __syscall_ulong_t it should re-define semid_ds.
> No, the whole point of using __syscall_ulong_t here is to avoid needing
> such a redefinition for ABIs using a different __syscall_ulong_t
> (currently just x32), provided __syscall_ulong_t indeed reflects the ABI
> in this case. It's generally the case for every structure definition that
> if a new kernel port somehow does things differently from every previous
> port then some definitions in glibc may need to change for that port
> (hopefully without duplicating too much); I don't think it's appropriate
> to add a comment about that to this code.
Alright, my thinking was indeed to warn the ABI where __syscall_ulong might
not reflect the ABI (but it also seems the case when kernel does try to