This is the mail archive of the mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCHv2] sysdeps/ieee754/soft-fp: ignore maybe-uninitialized with -O [BZ #19444]

On Sun, Sep 30, 2018 at 04:53:36PM +0000, Joseph Myers wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Sep 2018, Martin Jansa wrote:
> > +#include <libc-diag.h>
> > +/* R_f[01] are not set in cases where it is not used in packing, but the
> > +   compiler does not see that it is set in all cases where it is
> > +   used, resulting in warnings that it may be used uninitialized.
> > +   The location of the warning differs in different versions of GCC,
> > +   it may be where R is defined using a macro or it may be where the
> > +   macro is defined.  */
> This comment is missing the key information that it's specifically a 
> warning seen with -O1.

The other 3 cases of the same:;a=blob;f=sysdeps/ieee754/soft-fp/s_fma.c;h=41cf81a74bfc6a8c21c565fb04c90ced4bfd19e8;hb=refs/heads/master#l32;a=blob;f=sysdeps/ieee754/soft-fp/s_fmaf.c;h=afe64356b3a9c5f3467c35b80f33ba946fbeee46;hb=refs/heads/master#l32;a=blob;f=sysdeps/ieee754/soft-fp/s_fmal.c;h=4c2d4c5d9be09f0c8464fb20b81af3aff131e65d;hb=refs/heads/master#l32

are probably also triggered only with -O1, do you want me to update all
4 or just the new case?

Martin 'JaMa' Jansa     jabber:

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]