This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Improve strstr performance of short needles

From: Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh at gotplt dot org>
To: Wilco Dijkstra <Wilco dot Dijkstra at arm dot com>, "Gabriel F. T. Gomes" <gabriel at inconstante dot eti dot br>
Cc: "libc-alpha at sourceware dot org" <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>, nd <nd at arm dot com>
Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2018 06:30:33 +0530
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Improve strstr performance of short needles
References: <DB5PR08MB1030D79438AF0E17282F3E1783020@DB5PR08MB1030.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com> <20180928183018.551042ff@tereshkova> <DB5PR08MB1030F8FBED4FB20D34E2A1CE83EC0@DB5PR08MB1030.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com>

On 29/09/18 5:51 AM, Wilco Dijkstra wrote:

I haven't looked in detail at the GLIBC strstr benchmark results. I'm running
tests with natural language texts from 64 bytes to 256KB. Generally speaking

Would you be able to add a test that emulates that workload to glibcbenchtests?


Thanks,
Siddhesh

References:
- [PATCH] Improve strstr performance of short needles
  - From: Wilco Dijkstra
- Re: [PATCH] Improve strstr performance of short needles
  - From: Gabriel F. T. Gomes
- Re: [PATCH] Improve strstr performance of short needles
  - From: Wilco Dijkstra

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]