This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: Towards Meargeable patch submissions for glibc
On Monday 03 September 2018 09:06 PM, Joseph Myers wrote:
On Mon, 3 Sep 2018, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote:
I agree that is the ideal place to be in but it seems much harder to
auto-generate a full ChangeLog entry in that manner and not something I
Such a script specifically does not need to generate a full ChangeLog
entry (with separate descriptions of what changed in each entity), just a
list of changed entities.
Ah OK, that's still not easy, but not that bad. It may not be able to
do things like finding macro scope for [!MACRO_DEF] like entries without
a full scale parser.
That is, it is less about ChangeLog formats and more about getting it out of
the patch body. Would you be in favour of this decoupling?
I suspect there will be enough badly formatted commit messages that you'd
need to keep fixing things up after them, or to add hooks to check commits
on master for the required formatting. If there are too many such commits
it might not save much work in the end (given it's not saving the main
time sink with ChangeLog entries, which is writing them in the first
That's a fair point, let me take a stab at the ChangeLog file generation.