This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: Is adding a pthread wrapper for sched_{get,set}attr feasible?
- From: Joseph Myers <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
- To: Juri Lelli <juri dot lelli at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Florian Weimer <fw at deneb dot enyo dot de>, Szabolcs Nagy <szabolcs dot nagy at arm dot com>, <nd at arm dot com>, <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2018 19:50:16 +0000
- Subject: Re: Is adding a pthread wrapper for sched_{get,set}attr feasible?
- References: <20180822131514.GB27801@localhost.localdomain> <8aea7a69-0638-1c20-fa56-e5f27eaf484b@arm.com> <20180822143244.GC27801@localhost.localdomain> <1abf6029-9406-ae3d-f9e8-7cd9c687a928@arm.com> <87va826rsb.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> <20180823073133.GA31443@localhost.localdomain>
On Thu, 23 Aug 2018, Juri Lelli wrote:
> One could also look at a proposed extension that is currently under
> review (utilclamp [2]) to have an idea of how future further extensions
> will be handled.
I don't see any recent discussion of that on linux-api; please remind the
people involved that all extensions to the kernel/userspace API should go
through linux-api if they are to be properly reviewed and problems found
before they get into the kernel.
--
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com