This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH v8 0/8] Add support for ISO C threads.h

From: Rical Jasan <rj at 2c3t dot io>
To: Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval dot zanella at linaro dot org>
Cc: Joseph Myers <joseph at codesourcery dot com>, Carlos O'Donell <carlos at redhat dot com>, libc-alpha at sourceware dot org, Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat dot com>
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2018 06:54:54 -0700
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/8] Add support for ISO C threads.h
References: <1517591084-11347-1-git-send-email-adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org> <203a3def-74d0-fa66-9792-a587a089a359@linaro.org> <46c7b370-f98d-30a3-9aac-c5e2c5d5e1d0@linaro.org> <00cbaea3-d979-d766-58b1-a4b0822ca678@redhat.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1807192124540.2075@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <f4a21059-b980-ac64-9d63-b8aaf40df469@linaro.org> <becf41e9-415e-6c59-d32a-5551694823df@2c3t.io>

Should we really be saying "ISO C11" threads everywhere?  Would it be
appropriate to just say "ISO C"?  (I'm thinking about future ISO CXX
standards also having specifications for threads.)

Rical

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH v8 0/8] Add support for ISO C threads.h
  - From: Carlos O'Donell

References:
- Re: [PATCH v8 0/8] Add support for ISO C threads.h
  - From: Adhemerval Zanella
- Re: [PATCH v8 0/8] Add support for ISO C threads.h
  - From: Carlos O'Donell
- Re: [PATCH v8 0/8] Add support for ISO C threads.h
  - From: Joseph Myers
- Re: [PATCH v8 0/8] Add support for ISO C threads.h
  - From: Adhemerval Zanella
- Re: [PATCH v8 0/8] Add support for ISO C threads.h
  - From: Rical Jasan

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]