This is the mail archive of the mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH 1/1] Y2038: add function __difftime64

Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
I would like to know
if the following assumptions are correct:

- gnulib contains a year2038 module which is only intended to check
   whether time_t is limited to Y2038 or not.

Although true for now, in the long run year2038 could be changed to enable macros that will cause the implementation to use 64- instead of 32-bit time_t. This is a plausible thing to do once glibc has such a macro.

- gnulib does not provide difftime either, so ATM a difftime patch
   would only make sense in glibc, not gnulib.

Although Gnulib hasn't needed a difftime module yet, it might need one once this 32- vs 64-bit time_t stuff lands into glibc, so let's keep difftime.c usable for Gnulib.

- gnulib ... makes no assumption that it will be compiled into a shared object
   form which will provide the same functionalities for both 64-bit and
   32-bit callers.

Although that's generally true, Gnulib can be used in such shared objects by compiling it twice (once for each model), using different names for each entry point. I vaguely recall some people doing this sort of thing for 32- vs 64-bit file offsets, though I don't recommend the practice myself.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]