This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH 1/2] aarch64: Remove HWCAP_CPUID from HWCAP_IMPORTANT


On 06/28/2018 11:52 PM, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
This partially reverts

commit f82e9672ad89ea1ef40bbe1af71478e255e87c5e
Author:     Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh@sourceware.org>

     aarch64: Allow overriding HWCAP_CPUID feature check using HWCAP_MASK

The idea was to make it possible to disable cpuid based ifunc resolution
in glibc by changing the hwcap mask which the user could already control.

However the hwcap mask has an orthogonal role: it specifies additional
library search paths for the dynamic linker.  So "cpuid" got added to

I don't think that is correct[1]; I understood hwcap_mask to be a general tool that allows you to mask out hardware capabilities as needed and the library search paths feature happens to be a user of this. Another user is elf_machine_matches_host in sparc code for example, which uses to match the binary with supported hardware capabilities.

Meanwhile there is a tunable to set the cpu explicitly so it is possible
to disable the cpuid based dispatch without using a hwcap mask:

However, I'm not too attached to the hwcap_mask way of disabling CPUID, so removing the aarch64 check is OK with me. It was a good quick option to implement back when the tune.cpu tunable was not in (and they eventually went in together IIRC, so it was a moot point) but I agree that it is redundant now.

That said, it would be nice to hear from others (especially distro folks) since it may have been advertised as a way to disable the ifunc selection.

Siddhesh

[1] I don't have the historical reference to assert that it is definitely wrong, so if you have one I'll happily correct myself.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]