This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH 4/9] ldbl-128ibm-compat: Add a generic significand() implementation

From: Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho <tuliom at linux dot ibm dot com>
To: Joseph Myers <joseph at codesourcery dot com>, libc-alpha at sourceware dot org
Cc:
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2018 17:19:53 -0300
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/9] ldbl-128ibm-compat: Add a generic significand() implementation
References: <20180606223909.16675-1-tuliom@linux.ibm.com> <20180606223909.16675-5-tuliom@linux.ibm.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1806071325120.27583@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <87wouzbyd6.fsf@linux.ibm.com>

Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho <tuliom@linux.ibm.com> writes:

> Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com> writes:
>
>> On Wed, 6 Jun 2018, Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho wrote:
>>
>> For w_scalb you'd need to 
>> treat the existing w_scalb*_compat templates like the other compat ones - 
>
> I didn't follow completely your proposal here.
> Are you saying that ldbl-128ibm-compat also needs a w_scalbf128_compat?

Sorry.  I hit send too soon.
Please ignore this question.  :-D

-- 
Tulio Magno

References:
- [PATCH 0/9] Introduce ieee128 symbols and redirections
  - From: Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho
- [PATCH 4/9] ldbl-128ibm-compat: Add a generic significand() implementation
  - From: Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho
- Re: [PATCH 4/9] ldbl-128ibm-compat: Add a generic significand() implementation
  - From: Joseph Myers
- Re: [PATCH 4/9] ldbl-128ibm-compat: Add a generic significand() implementation
  - From: Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]