This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH 0/9] Introduce ieee128 symbols and redirections


On Wed, 13 Jun 2018, Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho wrote:

> Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com> writes:
> 
> > As a general principle, I'd suggest using a consistent naming convention 
> > for all the ieee128 function variants being added in both libc and libm.  
> > So, if __ieee128_* is used in libc that would indicate functions such as 
> > __ieee128_cosl in libm, for example.  (For the libm functions this is 
> > presumably mainly a matter of how a few macros get defined.)
> 
> Ack.  We're planning to use the format __*ieee128 everywhere.
> However, there are cases that need special treatment and will be slightly
> different, e.g.:  __nextowardf_to_ieee128 and __nexttoward_to_ieee128.
> 
> Is that OK?

Yes.

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]