This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: RFC: x86: Fall back to lazy binding for unrelocated IFUNC symbol [BZ #23240]

From: Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat dot com>
To: "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>
Cc: GNU C Library <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>
Date: Mon, 28 May 2018 11:27:23 +0200
Subject: Re: RFC: x86: Fall back to lazy binding for unrelocated IFUNC symbol [BZ #23240]
References: <20180526135209.GA23818@intel.com> <fbaa5916-fc89-0ab9-72ed-883a408eaad4@redhat.com> <CAMe9rOrKtM2t3khHZonNw_xpZ22Nj2BU1A-6_7eAa6nNaQGDDA@mail.gmail.com>

On 05/27/2018 04:36 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:

I'd like to avoid these messages.


We could restrict the warning to LD_DEBUG=bindings.

Thanks,
Florian

Follow-Ups:
- Re: RFC: x86: Fall back to lazy binding for unrelocated IFUNC symbol [BZ #23240]
  - From: Carlos O'Donell

References:
- RFC: x86: Fall back to lazy binding for unrelocated IFUNC symbol [BZ #23240]
  - From: H.J. Lu
- Re: RFC: x86: Fall back to lazy binding for unrelocated IFUNC symbol [BZ #23240]
  - From: Florian Weimer
- Re: RFC: x86: Fall back to lazy binding for unrelocated IFUNC symbol [BZ #23240]
  - From: H.J. Lu

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]