This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [PATCH] x86-64: Use __glibc_likely/__glibc_likely in dl-machine.h
On 05/02/2018 10:06, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 9:42 AM, H.J. Lu <hongjiu.lu@intel.com> wrote:
>> OK for master?
>>
>> H.J.
>> ---
>> * sysdeps/x86_64/dl-machine.h (elf_machine_rela): Replace
>> __builtin_expect with __glibc_likely and __glibc_likely.
>> (elf_machine_lazy_rel): Likewise.
>> ---
>> sysdeps/x86_64/dl-machine.h | 14 +++++++-------
>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/sysdeps/x86_64/dl-machine.h b/sysdeps/x86_64/dl-machine.h
>> index f525600071..5d45ca5342 100644
>> --- a/sysdeps/x86_64/dl-machine.h
>> +++ b/sysdeps/x86_64/dl-machine.h
>> @@ -310,10 +310,9 @@ elf_machine_rela (struct link_map *map, const ElfW(Rela) *reloc,
>> : (ElfW(Addr)) sym_map->l_addr + sym->st_value);
>>
>> if (sym != NULL
>> - && __builtin_expect (ELFW(ST_TYPE) (sym->st_info) == STT_GNU_IFUNC,
>> - 0)
>> - && __builtin_expect (sym->st_shndx != SHN_UNDEF, 1)
>> - && __builtin_expect (!skip_ifunc, 1))
>> + && __glibc_unlikely (ELFW(ST_TYPE) (sym->st_info) == STT_GNU_IFUNC)
>> + && __glibc_likely (sym->st_shndx != SHN_UNDEF)
>> + && __glibc_likely (!skip_ifunc))
>> {
>> # ifndef RTLD_BOOTSTRAP
>> if (sym_map != map
>> @@ -500,8 +499,8 @@ elf_machine_rela (struct link_map *map, const ElfW(Rela) *reloc,
>> break;
>> memcpy (reloc_addr_arg, (void *) value,
>> MIN (sym->st_size, refsym->st_size));
>> - if (__builtin_expect (sym->st_size > refsym->st_size, 0)
>> - || (__builtin_expect (sym->st_size < refsym->st_size, 0)
>> + if (__glibc_unlikely (sym->st_size > refsym->st_size)
>> + || (__glibc_unlikely (sym->st_size < refsym->st_size)
>> && GLRO(dl_verbose)))
>> {
>> fmt = "\
>> @@ -554,7 +553,8 @@ elf_machine_lazy_rel (struct link_map *map,
>> /* Check for unexpected PLT reloc type. */
>> if (__glibc_likely (r_type == R_X86_64_JUMP_SLOT))
>> {
>> - if (__builtin_expect (map->l_mach.plt, 0) == 0)
Thanks for changing it, these kind of construction with __builtin_expect is
confusing to read.
>> + /* Prelinked has been deprecated. */
>> + if (__glibc_likely (map->l_mach.plt == 0))
>> *reloc_addr += l_addr;
>> else
>> *reloc_addr =
>> --
>> 2.14.3
>>
>
> This is what I am checking in.
Seems straightforward enough, LGTM.