This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
[PATCH v3 10/18] string: Improve generic strchrnul
- From: Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval dot zanella at linaro dot org>
- To: libc-alpha at sourceware dot org
- Cc: Richard Henderson <rth at twiddle dot net>
- Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 10:47:54 -0200
- Subject: [PATCH v3 10/18] string: Improve generic strchrnul
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <1515588482-15744-1-git-send-email-adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>
From: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
New algorithm have the following key differences:
- Reads first word unaligned and use string-maskoff function to
remove unwanted data. This strategy follow assemble optimized
ones for aarch64, powerpc and tile.
- Use string-fz{b,i} functions.
Checked on x86_64-linux-gnu, i686-linux-gnu, sparc64-linux-gnu,
and sparcv9-linux-gnu by removing the arch-specific assembly
implementation and disabling multi-arch (it covers both LE and BE
for 64 and 32 bits).
[BZ #5806]
* string/strchrnul.c: Use string-fzb.h, string-fzi.h.
---
string/strchrnul.c | 146 +++++++++--------------------------------------------
1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 121 deletions(-)
diff --git a/string/strchrnul.c b/string/strchrnul.c
index 5a17602..beeab88 100644
--- a/string/strchrnul.c
+++ b/string/strchrnul.c
@@ -21,8 +21,12 @@
<http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>. */
#include <string.h>
-#include <memcopy.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
+#include <stdint.h>
+#include <string-fza.h>
+#include <string-fzb.h>
+#include <string-fzi.h>
+#include <string-maskoff.h>
#undef __strchrnul
#undef strchrnul
@@ -33,134 +37,34 @@
/* Find the first occurrence of C in S or the final NUL byte. */
char *
-STRCHRNUL (const char *s, int c_in)
+STRCHRNUL (const char *str, int c_in)
{
- const unsigned char *char_ptr;
- const unsigned long int *longword_ptr;
- unsigned long int longword, magic_bits, charmask;
- unsigned char c;
+ const op_t *word_ptr;
+ op_t found, word;
- c = (unsigned char) c_in;
+ /* Set up a word, each of whose bytes is C. */
+ op_t repeated_c = repeat_bytes (c_in);
- /* Handle the first few characters by reading one character at a time.
- Do this until CHAR_PTR is aligned on a longword boundary. */
- for (char_ptr = (const unsigned char *) s;
- ((unsigned long int) char_ptr & (sizeof (longword) - 1)) != 0;
- ++char_ptr)
- if (*char_ptr == c || *char_ptr == '\0')
- return (void *) char_ptr;
+ /* Align the input address to op_t. */
+ uintptr_t s_int = (uintptr_t) str;
+ word_ptr = (op_t*) (s_int & -sizeof (op_t));
- /* All these elucidatory comments refer to 4-byte longwords,
- but the theory applies equally well to 8-byte longwords. */
+ /* Read the first aligned word, but force bytes before the string to
+ match neither zero nor goal (we make sure the high bit of each byte
+ is 1, and the low 7 bits are all the opposite of the goal byte). */
+ op_t bmask = create_mask (s_int);
+ word = (*word_ptr | bmask) ^ (repeated_c & highbit_mask (bmask));
- longword_ptr = (unsigned long int *) char_ptr;
-
- /* Bits 31, 24, 16, and 8 of this number are zero. Call these bits
- the "holes." Note that there is a hole just to the left of
- each byte, with an extra at the end:
-
- bits: 01111110 11111110 11111110 11111111
- bytes: AAAAAAAA BBBBBBBB CCCCCCCC DDDDDDDD
-
- The 1-bits make sure that carries propagate to the next 0-bit.
- The 0-bits provide holes for carries to fall into. */
- magic_bits = -1;
- magic_bits = magic_bits / 0xff * 0xfe << 1 >> 1 | 1;
-
- /* Set up a longword, each of whose bytes is C. */
- charmask = c | (c << 8);
- charmask |= charmask << 16;
- if (sizeof (longword) > 4)
- /* Do the shift in two steps to avoid a warning if long has 32 bits. */
- charmask |= (charmask << 16) << 16;
- if (sizeof (longword) > 8)
- abort ();
-
- /* Instead of the traditional loop which tests each character,
- we will test a longword at a time. The tricky part is testing
- if *any of the four* bytes in the longword in question are zero. */
- for (;;)
+ while (1)
{
- /* We tentatively exit the loop if adding MAGIC_BITS to
- LONGWORD fails to change any of the hole bits of LONGWORD.
-
- 1) Is this safe? Will it catch all the zero bytes?
- Suppose there is a byte with all zeros. Any carry bits
- propagating from its left will fall into the hole at its
- least significant bit and stop. Since there will be no
- carry from its most significant bit, the LSB of the
- byte to the left will be unchanged, and the zero will be
- detected.
-
- 2) Is this worthwhile? Will it ignore everything except
- zero bytes? Suppose every byte of LONGWORD has a bit set
- somewhere. There will be a carry into bit 8. If bit 8
- is set, this will carry into bit 16. If bit 8 is clear,
- one of bits 9-15 must be set, so there will be a carry
- into bit 16. Similarly, there will be a carry into bit
- 24. If one of bits 24-30 is set, there will be a carry
- into bit 31, so all of the hole bits will be changed.
-
- The one misfire occurs when bits 24-30 are clear and bit
- 31 is set; in this case, the hole at bit 31 is not
- changed. If we had access to the processor carry flag,
- we could close this loophole by putting the fourth hole
- at bit 32!
-
- So it ignores everything except 128's, when they're aligned
- properly.
-
- 3) But wait! Aren't we looking for C as well as zero?
- Good point. So what we do is XOR LONGWORD with a longword,
- each of whose bytes is C. This turns each byte that is C
- into a zero. */
-
- longword = *longword_ptr++;
-
- /* Add MAGIC_BITS to LONGWORD. */
- if ((((longword + magic_bits)
-
- /* Set those bits that were unchanged by the addition. */
- ^ ~longword)
-
- /* Look at only the hole bits. If any of the hole bits
- are unchanged, most likely one of the bytes was a
- zero. */
- & ~magic_bits) != 0 ||
-
- /* That caught zeroes. Now test for C. */
- ((((longword ^ charmask) + magic_bits) ^ ~(longword ^ charmask))
- & ~magic_bits) != 0)
- {
- /* Which of the bytes was C or zero?
- If none of them were, it was a misfire; continue the search. */
-
- const unsigned char *cp = (const unsigned char *) (longword_ptr - 1);
-
- if (*cp == c || *cp == '\0')
- return (char *) cp;
- if (*++cp == c || *cp == '\0')
- return (char *) cp;
- if (*++cp == c || *cp == '\0')
- return (char *) cp;
- if (*++cp == c || *cp == '\0')
- return (char *) cp;
- if (sizeof (longword) > 4)
- {
- if (*++cp == c || *cp == '\0')
- return (char *) cp;
- if (*++cp == c || *cp == '\0')
- return (char *) cp;
- if (*++cp == c || *cp == '\0')
- return (char *) cp;
- if (*++cp == c || *cp == '\0')
- return (char *) cp;
- }
- }
+ if (has_zero_eq (word, repeated_c))
+ break;
+ word = *++word_ptr;
}
- /* This should never happen. */
- return NULL;
+ found = index_first_zero_eq (word, repeated_c);
+
+ return (char *) (word_ptr) + found;
}
weak_alias (__strchrnul, strchrnul)
--
2.7.4