This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

RE: [PATCH 1/2] Linux/x86: Update cancel_jmp_buf to match __jmp_buf_tag [BZ #22563]


> -----Original Message-----
> From: H.J. Lu [mailto:hjl.tools@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 9, 2018 13:18
> To: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>; Tsimbalist, Igor V
> <igor.v.tsimbalist@intel.com>; Senkevich, Andrew
> <andrew.senkevich@intel.com>
> Cc: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>; GNU C Library <libc-
> alpha@sourceware.org>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Linux/x86: Update cancel_jmp_buf to match
> __jmp_buf_tag [BZ #22563]
> 
> On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 2:47 AM, Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
> wrote:
> > On 12/18/2017 03:48 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 6:44 AM, Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Dez 18 2017, "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> This patch adds bits/types/__cancel_jmp_buf_tag.h to define struct
> >>>> __cancel_jmp_buf_tag so that Linux/x86 can add saved_mask to
> >>>> cancel_jmp_buf.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Isn't that an ABI change?
> >>>
> >>
> >> Yes, this change is exposed to application via <phread.h>.  The
> >> backward binary compatibility is provided by
> >>
> >> https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2017-12/msg00208.html
> >
> >
> > This doesn't seem to work:
> >
> > <https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2018-01/msg00178.html>
> >
> > I have no idea what is going on, but if we can't find the root cause,
> > I think we should revert all the setjmp changes.
> 
> Hi Andrew, Igor,
> 
> Please investigate to find out what happened.
> 
> Thanks.

We have connected with Tom Englund who reported issue and we will work on this issue.


--
Andrew

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]