This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH v2] New generic cosf

From: Joseph Myers <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
To: "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>
Cc: Paul Clarke <pc at us dot ibm dot com>, GNU C Library <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>, Matt Turner <mattst88 at gmail dot com>
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2017 00:12:36 +0000
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] New generic cosf
Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
References: <7aa9f1c0-cced-d24e-8982-4cdb346f1a6d@us.ibm.com> <CAMe9rOr_ytFCJGWurL2RDffXSXjXSpDGYqH0zQG6UeC+6MTjtg@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, 6 Dec 2017, H.J. Lu wrote:

> I assume both s_sinf.c and s_cosf.c use the same set of constant
> tables.  We should share them instead of duplication.

These implementations were originally proposed as an optimized sincosf.  I 
suggested in <https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2017-10/msg00366.html> 
that a single source file for all three functions might well make sense, 
in which case the constants would naturally be shared at that point.

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com

References:
- [PATCH v2] New generic cosf
  - From: Paul Clarke
- Re: [PATCH v2] New generic cosf
  - From: H.J. Lu

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]