This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [PATCH] powerpc: Update AT_HWCAP2 bits
- From: Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval dot zanella at linaro dot org>
- To: libc-alpha at sourceware dot org
- Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2017 14:46:52 -0200
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: Update AT_HWCAP2 bits
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <20171018191511.20685-1-tuliom@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <5A032CAF.9010707@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On 08/11/2017 14:11, Gustavo Romero wrote:
> Hi Tulio,
>
> On 18-10-2017 17:15, Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho wrote:
>> This patch will wait for the acceptance of the kernel patch [1] into
>> Linus' tree.
>>
>> [1] http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/824764/
>
> Is it really necessary to wait the TM patches into Linus' tree to push your
> patch as-is, given that from discussion @linuxppc-dev with Ellerman it's
> now clear that 'htm' feature and 'htm-no-suspend' feature are mutually
> exclusive?
>
> I'm just asking b/c I don't see any harm on running your patch with a kernel
> without TM no suspend mode support and it looks correct as-is.
Yes, we only assume that it is de facto canonical kernel ABI if it
has been accepted on Linus' tree.