This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: extend dl-minimal malloc implementation

From: Florian Weimer <fw at deneb dot enyo dot de>
To: Carlos O'Donell <carlos at redhat dot com>
Cc: Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval dot zanella at linaro dot org>, libc-alpha at sourceware dot org
Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2017 11:06:00 +0200
Subject: Re: extend dl-minimal malloc implementation
Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
References: <xnk23vy3ln.fsf@greed.delorie.com> <0a5122c8-a6f8-0351-0682-9a5ede15891d@redhat.com> <CAEMqeSpRmyH=pUzbjmW6pPeWqV9SorXsDdNXdZt8pkFpO5a12A@mail.gmail.com> <e77cb49e-2e8e-e506-a735-96d3bfbd4e4d@redhat.com> <894c545e-a6ee-73db-09f4-5a98ee08650e@redhat.com> <c19b4391-0ff1-b8ff-2f27-f4af751c5a25@redhat.com> <3a003b54-c861-8cbd-54f8-a1cc230602a2@linaro.org> <27e3ce74-d654-e198-6ca0-f80ac0cd2f60@redhat.com>

* Carlos O'Donell:

> But would we use that API for *every* allocation in the loader?

There are probably some exceptions.  The error message returned by
dlsym comes to my mind.  This is the kind of project where you
discover the scope only after you are half-way through it. 8-/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: extend dl-minimal malloc implementation
  - From: Zack Weinberg

References:
- Re: extend dl-minimal malloc implementation
  - From: Florian Weimer
- Re: extend dl-minimal malloc implementation
  - From: Florian Weimer
- Re: extend dl-minimal malloc implementation
  - From: Carlos O'Donell
- Re: extend dl-minimal malloc implementation
  - From: Florian Weimer
- Re: extend dl-minimal malloc implementation
  - From: Adhemerval Zanella
- Re: extend dl-minimal malloc implementation
  - From: Carlos O'Donell

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]