This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: Consistently use uintN_t not u_intN_t in libm
- From: Zack Weinberg <zackw at panix dot com>
- To: Joseph Myers <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
- Cc: GNU C Library <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2017 16:00:05 -0400
- Subject: Re: Consistently use uintN_t not u_intN_t in libm
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1708031955350.23567@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>
On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 3:56 PM, Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com> wrote:
>
> Do people think we should also change all the remaining uses of
> u_intN_t elsewhere in glibc, except for the definitions of those type
> names? (The bulk of the uses were the libm ones, but there are still
> about 80 uses elsewhere left after this patch.)
I'm for it.