This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [PATCH v2] Added Fiji Hindi language locale for Fiji
- From: Mike FABIAN <mfabian at redhat dot com>
- To: Rafal Luzynski <digitalfreak at lingonborough dot com>
- Cc: akhilesh dot k at samsung dot com, "libc-alpha\@sourceware.org" <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>, Maninder Singh <maninder1 dot s at samsung dot com>, 이학봉 <hakbong5 dot lee at samsung dot com>, PANKAJ MISHRA <pankaj dot m at samsung dot com>
- Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2017 09:58:57 +0200
- Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Added Fiji Hindi language locale for Fiji
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- Authentication-results: ext-mx01.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com
- Authentication-results: ext-mx01.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=mfabian at redhat dot com
- Dkim-filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mx1.redhat.com 3B0A388E60
- Dmarc-filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com 3B0A388E60
- References: <s9d4lukpzhm.fsf@redhat.com> <s9dk23k8pvn.fsf@redhat.com> <s9dfue94qzz.fsf@redhat.com> <s9dpode7yxw.fsf@redhat.com> <1499311496-17101-1-git-send-email-akhilesh.k@samsung.com> <20170706084440epcms5p72956dea06aee405ac15128ddcc9f18bf@epcms5p7> <20170707032409epcms5p6538b5bd0a7557a438a2bc554e35d27c6@epcms5p6> <20170707120134epcms5p45c51794cdf7bf25c043e9f5ef40820de@epcms5p4> <CGME20170706032814epcas5p1e1d259d6b9cfe591ae96f15a331779e9@epcms5p3> <20170710073810epcms5p3324e386304c4fe598664154af0432214@epcms5p3> <1787523961.381205.1499726189183@poczta.nazwa.pl>
Rafal Luzynski <digitalfreak@lingonborough.com> wrote:
> 10.07.2017 09:38 AKHILESH KUMAR <akhilesh.k@samsung.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> >> Hi Mike,
>> >>
>> >> [...]
>> >>>Maybe we need two locales hif_FJ and hif_FJ@devanagari ?
>> >>
>> > Maybe but In that case we need one more locale for hindi also
>> > hif_FJ@devanagari
>>
>> >If devanagari is more common for Fiji Hindi but Latin script is used as
>> >well, then we might need a hif_FJ@latin.
>>
>> I am native speaker of Hindi as per my study and analysis
>> We can write two locales
>> 1-> For devanagari hif_FJ@devanagari
>> hi_IN locale can be used in hif_FJ@devanagari
>> 2-> For latin “hif_FJ@latin or hif_FJ”
>
> IMHO it's better to have the default hif_FJ script. So better is
> hif_FJ for Latin instead of the explicit hif_FJ@latin, if Latin
> is more often used.
Yes, I think so too.
--
Mike FABIAN <mfabian@redhat.com>