This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [RFC 4/6] ARC: Initial port to glibc

From: Joseph Myers <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
To: Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat dot com>
Cc: Vineet Gupta <Vineet dot Gupta1 at synopsys dot com>, "libc-alpha @ sourceware . org" <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>, <linux-snps-arc at lists dot infradead dot org>, <Cupertino dot Miranda at synopsys dot com>
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2017 12:03:39 +0000
Subject: Re: [RFC 4/6] ARC: Initial port to glibc
Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
References: <1498550454-3560-1-git-send-email-vgupta@synopsys.com> <1498550454-3560-5-git-send-email-vgupta@synopsys.com> <3bd8b935-47c0-f190-ee6b-3d08e2f3a752@redhat.com> <2b02c462-44c4-02bb-6989-b3572834432e@synopsys.com> <e0b3a866-beed-b3c4-e0c8-37d074eed4a5@redhat.com>

On Tue, 27 Jun 2017, Florian Weimer wrote:

> (Realistically, I'd need a port which can build with
> build-many-glibcs.py for that anyway.)

It's probably not hard to increase the minimum symbol version for an 
existing port, especially one of the newer ones, for testing purposes.  
(It's possible you'd find missing SHLIB_COMPAT conditionals or similar in 
port-specific code when doing so, especially if doing it for an older 
port.)

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com

References:
- [RFC 0/6] glibc port to ARC architecture
  - From: Vineet Gupta
- [RFC 4/6] ARC: Initial port to glibc
  - From: Vineet Gupta
- Re: [RFC 4/6] ARC: Initial port to glibc
  - From: Florian Weimer
- Re: [RFC 4/6] ARC: Initial port to glibc
  - From: Vineet Gupta
- Re: [RFC 4/6] ARC: Initial port to glibc
  - From: Florian Weimer

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]