This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [RFC 0/6] glibc port to ARC architecture
- From: Joseph Myers <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
- To: Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Vineet Gupta <Vineet dot Gupta1 at synopsys dot com>, "libc-alpha @ sourceware . org" <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>, <linux-snps-arc at lists dot infradead dot org>, <Cupertino dot Miranda at synopsys dot com>
- Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2017 12:00:23 +0000
- Subject: Re: [RFC 0/6] glibc port to ARC architecture
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org>
On Tue, 27 Jun 2017, Florian Weimer wrote:
> On 06/27/2017 10:00 AM, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> > This is a Request for comments for glibc port to ARC architecture.
> > http://www.synopsys.com/IP/ProcessorIP/ARCProcessors/Pages/default.aspx
> > The Linux kernel, uClibc, buildroot have been upstream for quite some time.
> Is it possible to build the new port with scripts/build-many-glibcs.py?
Any new port should have support added to build-many-glibcs.py for all
ABIs supported by the port (e.g. both endiannesses, if you support both BE
and LE, and any other ABI variants).
You should make sure that produces clean test results for all the
compilation tests, for all those variants.
You should also include results for the full testsuite, including
execution tests (whether testing natively, or cross testing with
test-wrapper set to execute tests for a cross build), in the submission of
the port (and those should be as clean as possible).
Any new port should be added to the list in README, and have a NEWS entry
Joseph S. Myers