This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: PSA: glibc buildbot slave up for aarch64

On Tuesday 02 May 2017 08:51 PM, Joseph Myers wrote:
> Would such keywords also cover cases marked as expected to fail within the 
> tests themselves (so the overall status of a test ends up as PASS)?  E.g. 
> bugs 14362, 16437, 16919, 17786, 18228, 18231, 18232, 21260, 21278, 21279 
> have such local xfail markings within the conform/ tests so they don't 
> hide failures for other test assertions within the same (standard, header) 
> pairs.

Given that they are reproducible via the testsuite (despite the overall
PASS), yes they should have a testsuite-fail keyword.

Siddhesh
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]