This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Assume that accept4 is available

From: Joseph Myers <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
To: Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat dot com>
Cc: GNU C Library <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 16:04:56 +0000
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Assume that accept4 is available
Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
References: <4ede44de-6607-025d-c816-a666d10db7dc@redhat.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1704191449200.28423@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <085ffcd7-6ace-ac17-5e32-e2e71a86cc60@redhat.com>

On Thu, 20 Apr 2017, Florian Weimer wrote:

> > By removing the description and definition of __ASSUME_ACCEPT4_SOCKETCALL,
> > this loses the information about what __ASSUME_RECVMMSG_SOCKETCALL and
> > __ASSUME_SENDMMSG_SOCKETCALL mean, since the comments on the macros for
> > recvmmsg and sendmmsg define them by reference to the corresponding macros
> > for accept4.
> 
> Sorry about that.  Should we restore the comment with the attached patch?

Yes.

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com

References:
- [PATCH] Assume that accept4 is available
  - From: Florian Weimer
- Re: [PATCH] Assume that accept4 is available
  - From: Joseph Myers
- Re: [PATCH] Assume that accept4 is available
  - From: Florian Weimer

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]