This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [PATCH] Assume that accept4 is available
- From: Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat dot com>
- To: GNU C Library <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2017 14:05:07 +0200
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] Assume that accept4 is available
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- Authentication-results: ext-mx06.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com
- Authentication-results: ext-mx06.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=fweimer at redhat dot com
- Dkim-filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mx1.redhat.com AD1413D978
- Dmarc-filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com AD1413D978
- References: <4ede44de-6607-025d-c816-a666d10db7dc@redhat.com>
On 04/14/2017 12:45 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
I tested this on x86-64, i386, s390x, s390, aarch64. I also manually
compared some object files after cross-compilation; there were no
changes to accept4.o in the cases I checked (not even on ia64).
(Comparison is hampered by the fact that the path and executable names
used by build-many-glibcs.py for binutils are somewhat unpredictable.)
Now also tested on ppc64, ppc64le, ppc.
Thanks,
Florian