This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On 12 Mar 2017 16:00, John David Anglin wrote: > On 2017-03-12, at 3:41 PM, Torvald Riegel wrote: > > Carlos was thinking about re-arranging the struct layout and reserving > > the LSB of __g1_orig_size for the bit that would be set in a condvar > > initialized by linuxthreads: > > https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2017-03/msg00058.html > > It's up to Carlos. Personally, I'm not sure it's worth maintaining the linuxthreads compatibility. > Removing it gets rid of a lot of hppa code. i agree -- linuxthreads should die w/hppa. if we can keep compat with nptl but drop linuxthreads, let's do it. we've already broken the ABI once after the linuxthreads->nptl change. -mike
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |